Tag: mutual funds

The Problem with Balanced Funds

Returns vs. Volatility

Balanced funds are those that invest in both stocks and bonds. The exact allocation is up to the fund manager. For example, the Tata Balanced fund is right now 22.85% in bonds and the rest in equities, according to Morningstar.

tata balanced asset allocation

Balanced funds are pitched as having lesser risk than equity-only funds. But what investors gain in lesser volatility, they give up on lower returns and higher fees.

Tata Balanced vs. ICICI Pru. Value Discovery

Between 2007-01-02 and 2015-06-02, Tata Balanced Fund has returned a cumulative 235.97% with an IRR of 15.48% vs. ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund’s cumulative return of 316.55% and an IRR of 18.47%download

Compare the drawdowns:

drawdowns tatas vs icici

For the moderate-risk taking investor who is typically attracted to balanced funds, a 16% drawdown hurts just as much as a 27% drawdown.

When it comes to fees, Tata’s has an expense ratio of 2.91% vs. ICICI’s 2.34%. Is the extra 50bps worth the safety offered?

HDFC Balanced Fund vs. ICICI Pru. Value Discovery

It is a similar deal with HDFC’s Balanced fund as well: lower returns (IRR: 15.24%) and no escape from double-digit drawdownsdownload

Conclusion

The sales-pitch for balanced funds focus on the investors availability heuristic where people tend to heavily weigh their judgments toward more recent information, making new opinions biased toward that latest news. Ever since the market corrected in March a growing flock of blogs and articles started pitching balanced funds. But before you fall for the marketing pitch, take a step back and ensure that you are not giving too much away for perceived safety.

The Worst Mutual Funds – Quantitative

Introduction

Our previous post looked at the 10 best mutual funds based on sharpe ratio, bear-beta, information ratio, draw-down depth and draw-down length between Jan-2010 and May-2015. Here are the 10 worst funds based on the same metrics.

As you can imagine, infrastructure funds performed poorly in this time-frame. We ignore them for now.

Sharpe Ratio

Bear-Beta

Information Ratio

Draw-down Depth

Draw-down Length

Past Performance

Conclusion

Mutual funds are marketed as wealth builders. However, the truth is that most of them struggle. As you can see from the analysis here, there are quite a few of them with low-single-digit returns over 5-year time-frames. At last count, there were more than 5300 different schemes that you could choose from.

Are you getting the right advise? Get in touch with us if you are looking to invest! Call us or Whatsapp us at +918026650232

The Best Mutual Funds – Quantitative

Introduction

Mutual fund investors are faced with a zillion choices in the marketplace. At last count, there were more than 5300 different schemes that an investor could choose from. When confronted with such a large number of choices, investors either spiral into an “analysis paralysis” mode and end up doing nothing or blindly invest in whatever their broker recommends – both these paths lead to situations that are injurious to the investor’s long-term financial health.

In this post, we try to simplify the choices in front of the investor by ranking the top 10 funds based these risk metrics: sharpe ratio, bear-beta, information ratio, draw-down depth and draw-down length between Jan-2010 and May-2015.

Sharpe Ratio

Bear-Beta

Information Ratio

The information ratio is a ratio of the portfolio’s returns above the returns of a benchmark (CNX MIDCAP, in this case) to the volatility of those returns.

This is probably a better metric than the Sharpe ratio to rank funds.

Nice to see that both the Value Discovery fund and an MNC fund make this list.

Draw-down Depth

Draw-down depth measures the max-loss from peak valuation.

For example, the Blended Plan at the top of the list only lost 0.35% from its peak valuation between 2010 and 2015.

Portfolios with a lot of short-term bonds test well for this metric. But note the pathetic IRRs – no pain = no gain!

Draw-down Length

The draw-down length is a measure of how many days it took the fund to get back the previous peak valuation after a draw-down.

Shorter bounce-backs typically indicate high-quality portfolios.

Nice to see both the MNC funds make this list.

Past Performance

Conclusion

We looked at broad spectrum of funds – including those with bond allocations – to ferret out a good set of funds that investors can consider. Depending on what is more important to the investor, the appropriate set of metrics can be weighted to fit individual risk appetites.

Mutual fund investors whom we advise will immediately recognize some of these funds as they are already part of their portfolios. Get in touch with us if you are looking to invest! Call us or Whatsapp us at +918026650232

The MNC Fund Gravy Train

What are MNC Funds?

MNC funds invest in the Indian listed shares of foreign firms, like Bosch, Britannia and Colgate Palmolive. The funds are bench-marked against the CNX MNC Index.

The MNC index has out-performed pretty much every other market-cap index. We had discussed this previously and had pointed out that the UTI MNC Fund is decent place to get exposure to this asset class.

UTI vs Birla Sun Life

Thankfully, there are only two funds that track this asset class – one is the UTI MNC Fund and the other is the Birla Sun Life MNC Fund. Here’s how their growth schemes compare:

Birla Sun Life MNC fund vs. UTI MNC fund

 

Between 2006-07-03 and 2015-03-19, BSL MNC Fundhas returned a cumulative 478.61% with an IRR of 22.31% vs. UTI MNC Fund’s cumulative return of 427.17% and an IRR of 21.02%. (http://svz.bz/1Exk126)

The difference in performance between the two funds is de minimis when you consider that the period of comparison is almost eight years. The main thing to focus on here is that an IRR of ~22% is extremely hard to achieve in any asset class over that stretch of time.

MNC.funds.2015-3-20

Active Management

SYMBOL Birla Sunlife MNC Fund UTI MNC Fund CNX MNC
INGVYSYABK 8.97 3.01
ICRA 8.67
HONAUT 8.53 3.48
BAYERCROP 8.33
BOSCHLTD 5.99 7.19 9.22
GILLETTE 5.89 2.71
GLAXO 5.48 1.44 2.59
PFIZER 5.15 1.38
MARUTI 3.62 7.16 18.09
STERLINH 3.61
CRISIL 3.01 2.92
HINDUNILVR 2.74 4.21 24.37
CUMMINSIND 2.73 4.36 4.38
WABCOINDIA 2.47 0.32
ACC 1.96
BATAINDIA 1.65
HITACHIHOM 1.64
FAGBEARING 1.47
KANSAINER 1.45
COLPAL 1.39 1.33 5.02
PGHH 1.35 1.92
OFSS 1.15 2.43 2.62
SMLISUZU 1.15 0.12
AMBUJACEM 1.11 3.64 7.25
NESTLEIND 0.94 1.38
ALSTOMT&D 0.72 1.76
BLUEDART 0.71 0.58
SIEMENS 0.7 3.04 4.66
FMGOETZE 0.69
ITC 0.66
AIL 0.59 0.17
DISAQ 0.57
AKZOINDIA 0.53 1.6
FULFORD 0.52
ABB 0.49 2.51
SANOFI 0.46 1.41
ITDCEM 0.46 2.31
CASTROLIND 0.45 2.97 2.59
RANBAXY 0.36 0.58
SCHNEIDER 0.26
MPHASIS 0.07 2.33 1.2
EICHERMOT 6.28
BRITANNIA 4.17 4.84
MCDOWELL-N 2.53
SKFINDIA 2.47
MAHINDCIE 2.13
SSLT 1.95 7.96
INGERRAND 1.49
MONSANTO 1.13
TIMKEN 1.07
CLNINDIA 0.97
GSKCONS 0.9 2.69
AUTOAXLES 0.38
WHIRLPOOL 0.21
Both funds are actively managed. There is no “index-hugging” going on here. However, between the two, the Birla Sunlife fund significantly differs from the CNX MNC index.

Portfolio trajectories

Both have allowed their winners to run and have different positions that have worked out well for them. Here’s how the Birla Sunlife Fund looks like:

And this is how the UTI Fund looks like:

The View

You will do well to have either fund in your portfolio. But given the narrow focus of these funds, these should complement your portfolio rather than dominate it. If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch!

Funds that (also) invest in foreign markets

Diversification vs. Returns vs. Currency hedging

Some Indian funds, under the guise of diversification, invest in foreign equities. However, the benefit of diversification comes from investing across asset classes. Does investing in the same asset class, i.e., equities, really give the investor uncorrelated returns? Or are funds using international equities as a rupee-short in disguise?

World Equity Correlation

When you run correlations between the monthly returns of the S&P 500, Nasdaq, FTSE 100, Nikkei and CNX 500, here’s what you get:

S&P 500 Nasdaq FTSE 100 Nikkei 225 CNX 500
S&P 500 1.0000000 0.8387130 0.8537901 0.6144493 0.5226191
Nasdaq 0.8387130 1.0000000 0.6913427 0.5909979 0.5499836
FTSE 100 0.8537901 0.6913427 1.0000000 0.5717508 0.5216565
Nikkei 225 0.6144493 0.5909979 0.5717508 1.0000000 0.5633231
CNX 500 0.5226191 0.5499836 0.5216565 0.5633231 1.0000000

world-correlation

A zero or negative correlation would validate the diversification claim. But that is not the case. Indian equities are loosely correlated with international stock markets.

World equity Returns

When it comes to returns, Indian equities have outperformed all the main indices.

world equity returns

Currency hedge

The 50% depreciation in the rupee since 2000, however, make a strong case for adding short-INR/long-USD assets.

USDINR

Competency

Although Rupee depreciation makes a case for holding dollar assets, why do it in a convoluted way by buying individual stocks? The competency of an Indian asset manager in picking stocks in a foreign market is questionable.

For example, the PPFAS fund holds about 20% of its assets in foreign equities. This, at a time when most developed markets have given up on stock-picking and have turned to indexing instead. Can a manager, sitting in India, select stocks in a foreign market that outperform that market?

The problem with a mixed-in portfolio like PPFAS is that it is very difficult to break performance down to its components. Between 2014-01-01 and 2015-02-25, PPFAS Long Term Value Fund has returned a cumulative 44.20% with an IRR of 37.45% vs. BSE MID CAP’s cumulative return of 58.84% and an IRR of 49.50%. (http://svz.bz/1DZzX1L)

Conclusion

Exposure to US Dollar assets makes sense given the historical depreciation of the Indian rupee against the US dollar. However, we are not convinced that buying a fund that tries to pick stocks in foreign markets is the way to go. Investors would be better of being net short the rupee, or buying the S&P 500 ETF separately.