Tag: momentum

MSCI: Momentum trumps Value

Our previous posts explored how swapping market-cap weighted indices with momentum indices considerably boosted returns in the classic GEM dual-momentum model. And we followed that up with a post comparing different momentum indices. Here, we try to address the quintessential question for times: which strategy should you bet on? Value or momentum?

Thankfully, MSCI has an exhaustive set of factor indices that cover both quantitative value and momentum. Going back to 1995.

MSCI Prime Value

MSCI Prime Value indices are a pretty good quality and value screen that cover a diversified universe of securities in a country/region.

From their factsheet about index construction methodology:
Quality scores are calculated for all Parent Index constituents. The Quality Z-scores are calculated using fundamental variables such as Return on Equity, Earnings Variability and Debt to Equity. The securities are sorted in descending order of the quality scores.
The Prime Value score for each security in the Quality Parent Universe is calculated by combining the z-scores of four value descriptors, namely Trailing Price to Earnings (P/E), Price to Book Value (P/B), Price to Sales (P/S) and Price to Cash Earnings (P/CE).

MSCI Momentum

MSCI Momentum indices are a pretty good momentum screen that covers a diversified universe of securities in a country/region.

From their factsheet about index construction methodology:
The Momentum value for each security is calculated by combining recent 12-month and 6-month local price performance of the security. The price performance is computed excluding recent 1-month. The Momentum value thus computed is further adjusted with corresponding volatility of the security.
Risk-adjusted Price Momentum (for the 6-month horizon and 12-month horizon) computed above are standardized into z-scores. The z-scores are combined in equal proportion and standardized to arrive at a single Momentum combined score.

Index coverage

The MSCI ACWI is the mothership capturing all sources of equity returns in 23 developed and 24 emerging markets. Other indices feed into this. From their website:

The MSCI IMI – Investable Market Index – covers all investable large-, mid- and small-cap securities.

We went diving through their website to list those countries/regions that have all three of Prime Value, Momentum and IMI indices. We landed with: USA, UK, Europe, Japan, World, EM and ACWI.

Value vs. Momentum for both Developed and Emerging Markets

The ACWI pretty much covers everything under the sun, except Frontier markets. And here’s how Value, Momentum and All-Market strategies performed:
MSCI.ACWI.prime.momentum.cumulative

Momentum trumped Value.

Value vs. Momentum for Emerging Markets

MSCI.EM.prime.momentum.cumulative

Momentum and Value seem neck-and-neck with the former slightly ahead. Both trump All-Market.

Value vs. Momentum for Developed Markets

MSCI.WORLD.prime.momentum.cumulative

Once again, Momentum trumped Value.

Value vs. Momentum for US, UK and JP

USA:
MSCI.USA.prime.momentum.cumulative

United Kingdom:
MSCI.UNITED.prime.momentum.cumulative

Japan:
MSCI.JAPAN.prime.momentum.cumulative

Take-away

Unless you expect the country/region you are planning to invest in to experience a Japanese style 20-year deflationary death spiral with zombie companies roaming about, you are better off with momentum.

Source and annual performance charts are on github.

MSCI Country-wise Momentum Indices

MSCI momentum indices are a boon to anyone wishing to analyze the base case returns over long time horizons. Irrespective of the index launch date, they back-fill strategy returns to give a sense of how they would have performed in previous years. Also, with the US Dollar as their base currency, it makes apples-to-apples comparisons possible.

All country momentum indices

MSCI.country.momentum.yearwise.heat.2000-01-31.2018-12-31

Select country momentum indices

MSCI.sub-country.momentum.yearwise.heat.1996-05-31.2018-12-31

The cumulative returns chart tells a better story:
MSCI.sub-country.momentum.cumulative

Two things

  1. Strikingly narrow difference between India and World momentum indices.
  2. Shallow drawdowns of USA Momentum compared to the rest.

Code and more charts on github.

Global Equities Momentum

Gary Antonacci created the Global Equities Momentum (GEM) model that applied dual momentum to stock and bond indices. It toggles between stocks and bonds using 12-month trailing returns. And when it toggles to “stocks,” it chooses between US equities and International (ex-US) equities based on whichever posted higher returns in the previous 12-months. Newfound Research has a chart that puts it across succinctly:

The model uses the S&P 500 index as a stand-in for US equities and the WORLD ex USA index for international stocks. However, there is nothing in the construction that prevents us from replacing those market-cap based indices with momentum based ones.

US Momentum / Market-cap International

Scenario 1: keep everything the same, except in the last stage, instead of buying S&P 500, buy US Momentum (SP 500×1).
Scenario 2: swap out S&P 500 and put US Momentum everywhere in the decision tree (MOM).

In the cumulative return chart below, the black line is the base case. It represents GEM as originally designed. The red line is Scenario 1 above, green is Scenario 2.
sp500.mom.GEM.cumulative

Even though Scenario 2 has higher returns, it comes at the cost of higher drawdowns. Scenario 1 seems to strike a compromise.
Base case drawdowns:
SP500.GEM.dd
Scenario 1 drawdowns:
SP500x.GEM.dd
Scenario 2 drawdowns:
MTUM.GEM.dd

US Momentum / International Momentum

What if, we bought International Momentum (WORLD ex USA MOMENTUM) instead of the market-cap based WORLD ex USA?
Scenario 3 (dark blue): keep everything the same, except in the last stage, instead of buying S&P 500, buy US Momentum. And instead of buying market-cap international, buy WORLD ex USA MOMENTUM (SP 500×2).
Scenario 4 (light blue): swap out S&P 500 and put US Momentum everywhere. And instead of buying market-cap international, buy WORLD ex USA MOMENTUM (MOMx2).

sp500.mom.world.GEM.cumulative

Scenario 3 drawdowns:
SP500x2.GEM.dd
Scenario 4 drawdowns:
MTUMx2.GEM.dd

Here are returns broken down annually for all the scenarios discussed above:
sp500.mtum.x2.GEM.annual

It appears that using the S&P 500 index for making decisions about buying US vs. World ex-US momentum boosts returns while keeping a floor under drawdowns.

Code and charts are on github.

MSCI USA Momentum Index

In our previous post, Momentum: Peek under the hood before you invest, we compared a couple of momentum ETFs listed in the US. The most popular one, MTUM, was launched in April 2013. For an investor who is considering it, a five-year sample size is hardly enough. Thankfully, the ETF tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Index. And even though the index itself was launched in February 2013, MSCI has back-filled index levels going back from 1975.

USA Momentum vs. S&P 500 Annual Returns

msci-usa-mom.sp500.annual

USA Momentum vs. S&P 500 Cumulative Returns

msci-usa-mom.sp500.cumulative

It looks like the Momentum Index is highly correlated with the S&P 500 index and for a little bit more volatility, investors end up with quite a bit of excess returns. Does it make sense to swap out the staid old market-cap weighted SPY with MTUM?

Momentum: Peek under the hood before you invest

Quantitative momentum investing is fairly new in India. To compare different strategies, you need real-world data spanning a complete cycle. The best proxy for this turns out to be US listed ETFs – they have one price (unlike mutual fund share classes) and their adjusted prices can be easily downloaded. Here, we take a look at two momentum ETFs, DWAQ and MTUM, to highlight why investors should go beyond just running a screen for “momentum” and investing in whatever comes up first.

DWAQ vs. QQQ

DWAQ, the Invesco DWA NASDAQ Momentum ETF, was listed back in May 2003. QQQ is a plain vanilla market cap ETF based on the Nasdaq-100 Index. Here are the descriptions from their issuer websites:

The Invesco DWA NASDAQ Momentum ETF is based on the Dorsey Wright® NASDAQ Technical Leaders Index. The Index is comprised of approximately 100 securities from an eligible universe of approximately 1,000 securities of large capitalization companies from the NASDAQ US Benchmark Index. All securities in the universe are ranked using a proprietary relative strength (momentum) measure. Each security’s score is based on intermediate and long-term price movements relative to a representative market benchmark and the other eligible securities. The top 100 securities are selected for the Index. (Invesco)

The Invesco QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the Nasdaq-100 Index®. The Index includes 100 of the largest domestic and international nonfinancial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market based on market capitalization. (Invesco)

Here are their relative returns:

Not the torch bearer for momentum that we had hoped for.

MTUM vs. VONE

MTUM, the iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, came a good 10 years after DWAQ. Not constrained just to the Nasdaq, it provides wider exposure to large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks exhibiting relatively higher price momentum. (iShares) It is only fair that we compare it to VONE, which is Vanguard’s Russell 1000 ETF. Russell 1000 covers most of the US large- and mid-cap universe. (Vanguard)

Here are their relative returns:

Not bad! That’s almost a 4% difference in annualized returns.

MTUM vs. DWAQ

DWAQ trailed MTUM by about 5% in annualized returns for the period. Probably because it has a more diversified portfolio compared to MTUM’s. This should have lead to shallower drawdowns but that is not the case – DWAQ returns are a lot more volatile than MTUM’s. Will MTUM’s volatility adjusted price momentum continue to out-perform DWAQ’s “proprietary relative strength” momentum? Who knows?

If you think it is a tough job deciding between the two, consider this: there are over 40 momentum ETFs currently listed in the US. Each one slices the data a bit differently, making it absolutely essential that you peek under the hood before you click that buy button!

Charts created using the StockViz Compare Tool.