Category: Investing Insight

Sometimes, when you are comparing funds from different AMCs, you stumble across a pair of them that are so similar that it becomes a tough call choosing between them. For example, Religare Invesco MID N SMALL CAP Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund are right on top of each other. Try to spot the difference here (Jan-2012 through Jan-2015):

Between 2012-01-02 and 2015-01-07, Religare Invesco MID N SMALL CAP Fund has returned a cumulative 172.88% with an IRR of 39.49% vs. ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund’s cumulative return of 170.32% and an IRR of 39.05%.

Their drawdowns are similar as well. And since the NAV is quoted after all expenses, Religare’s expense ratio of 2.97% vs. ICICI’s 2.34% is factored into the returns.

In terms of metrics, Religare is marginally better than ICICI. However, there is nothing there to swing the decision one way or the other.

Run the FundCompare tool and have a look for yourself.

Large-cap stocks

Large-cap stocks are less volatile, ceterus paribus, compared to mid-cap and small-cap stocks. For most first-time investors, the set of Top 100 Funds offers a straight-forward way of adding equity exposure.

Picking the right scheme

As an investor, you should care about two things: risk-adjusted returns and expenses. While the Birla fund gave better returns, it charged a higher fee compared to UTI. But are those higher returns sustainable? Investors should be willing to pay more for more. This is where the FundCompare tool can help.

Birla vs. UTI

Between 2009-07-01 and 2014-12-29, Birla Sun Life Top 100 Fund (Growth Option) has returned a cumulative 155.00% with an IRR of 18.56% vs. UTI TOP 100 Fund (Growth Option)’s cumulative return of 108.35% and an IRR of 14.28%.

On the face of it, Birla’s higher fees seems worth it. But it looks like higher returns came at the expense of higher risk. Birla’s beta (vs. CNX 100) is 0.90761 vs. UTI’s 0.83478 and the latter had deeper drawdowns as well. However, the Sortino Ratio tilts the scale towards Birla’s fund: 0.10762 vs. UTI’s 0.09043.

Conclusion

If you are looking for large-cap exposure then go for Birla Sun Life Top 100 Fund.

The dilemma

Ownership of a diversified, un-correlated set of assets remains the touchstone of a well crafted portfolio. We had discussed how adding bonds to your equity portfolio reduces volatility before. However, comparing correlations between funds within the same asset class is a challenge.

For example, say you already have the Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund in your portfolio and your agent is pitching the Sundaram Select Midcap fund, how do you figure out whether to add to your existing holding of the Reliance fund, add an extra line item or switch to Sundaram?

Comparative returns

Between 2006-04-03 and 2014-12-19, Reliance’s Fund returned a cumulative 280.08% with an IRR of 16.55% vs. Sundaram’s cumulative return of 290.44% and an IRR of 16.91%.

As you can see, the wealth charts are almost on top of each other. The correlation chart confirms it:

Except for a few outliers, they are almost the same fund packaged differently.

Histogram of returns

The FundCompare tool also gives you the histogram of fund returns and the associated skewness. In this case, the Reliance Fund has a skew of -0.15 vs. Sundaram’s +0.22. Given that the average returns are more-or-less the same, this means that Sundaram’s Fund is better. Besides, it also appears that Sundaram’s Fund has a better Sharpe ratio.

Given that Reliance’s Fund has an expense ratio of 2.29% vs. Sundaram’s 2.26%, I would say “switch.”

Compare Your Funds

Before pulling the trigger based on what your fund broker/adviser tells you, get a free quantitative analysis of your options on our FundCompare tool.