Category: Investing Insight

Investing insight to make you a better investor.

Optimization vs. Maximization

The dog years of 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013

According to AMFI, these are the 5 largest funds at the end of March-2015:

Scheme Name AUM (Cr.)
HDFC Equity Fund – Growth Option
1,280,287
HDFC Top 200 Fund – Growth Option
1,009,121
Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund-Growth Plan-Growth Option
764,383
HDFC MID-CAP OPPORTUNITIES FUND – Growth Option
715,865
ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund – Regular Plan – Growth
645,946

What this means is that there is at least one person in your immediate network who would have invested in one of these funds.

Now let’s take a walk down memory lane. 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were the worst years for the Indian economy. The RBI had messed up monetary policy leading to high inflation (double digits), there was a currency panic (rupee went from 45 to a dollar to 65), a never-ending series of scams and a government hell bent on redistribution. The only two asset classes that were doing well at the time were gold and real estate. GOLDBEES, the gold ETF, returned 13.25% (IRR) during that period. Fixed deposits were yielding around 11%. How would a typical investor react if his actively managed equity investments gave the following returns?

Scheme Name IRR
HDFC Equity Fund – Growth Option
7.00%
HDFC Top 200 Fund – Growth Option
6.74%
Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund-Growth Plan-Growth Option
12.00%
HDFC MID-CAP OPPORTUNITIES FUND – Growth Option
13.24%
ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund – Regular Plan – Growth
11.09%

Here is Gold (in red) vs. HDFC Equity Fund (in black):

Needless to say, most investors who dipped their toes into the equity markets in 2010 gave up after a couple of years and still believe that the whole mutual fund business is a scam.

First half of 2015

We are supposed to be in a bull market. But let’s see how the first half worked out for the HDFC Equity Fund:

IRR of -2.39%. And bonds lost money too (in June.) Bull markets are not immune to prolonged periods of a “sideways” market.

Diversification across assets

A standard response to most investing problems in diversification. Invest a little into a variety of asset classes – equities, commodities, real-estate, gold, bonds – and you will be fine.

The problem with diversification is that it always feels wrong. For example, there are “balanced” funds that are supposed to allocate between both bonds and equities. They end up having lower draw-downs because of this. If you compare the ICICI Prudential Balanced Fund with HDFC Equity Fund between 2010-2013, the latter has an IRR of 11.38% vs. 7.00% of the former. But during the bull market of 2014, the balanced-fund gave an IRR of 45.47% vs. the equity fund’s 53.83%. So the lower draw-down comes at the expense of performance. It is a huge cognitive burden for investors to live with.

The kind of assets you pick for diversifying into also matters. For example, there was this big thing back in the day about the “commodity super-cycle.” About how the insatiable appetite for all sorts of commodities from China would keep growing to infinity. Plus, commodities were supposed to uncorrelated with equities. So great for diversification, right? Here’s how Mirae Global Commodity Equity Fund compares to the HDFC Equity Fund:

Commodity stocks did turn out to be uncorrelated but not in a way that you would like. And the commodities themselves are bouncing along multi-year lows right now.

What about bonds? Surely, they are safe. But let’s not forget that in 2009 and 2013, gilts drew-down double digits and their long-term IRRs are between 7% and 10%.

gilt drawdowns

Diversifying across geographies

What if you invested in international funds? After all, the rupee keeps going down, right? Depends on where you look. Between 2010 and 2013 (the dog years) the Birla Sun Life International Equity Fund – Plan A gave an IRR of 16.09% vs. HDFC Equity Fund’s 7%. But before you pat yourself on the back, between 2014 and now, the latter gave an IRR of 3.06% vs. 32.54% of the former. And Religare’s Pan European Equity Fund gave 1.50%.

Diversification means that your overall portfolio will trail behind the best performing asset class du jour. Psychologically, it is a very difficult thing to stick to.

Investing fads and broker recommendations

Of all the poor choices that investors can make, the worst is giving into investing fads. Back in 2004, there was this whole “India shining” marketing slogan. And now there is “make in India”, “smart cities”, “digital India”, etc. And almost every single time, fund houses come out with new schemes that tag along the slogan du jour. Here are some examples:

Morgan Stanley came out with their stock picks if Modi won (Theme created Dec 6, 2013):
morgan stanley strong election result

Here’s one on the Rail Budget (Theme, created Feb 26, 2015)
rail budget 2015 theme

So much for betting on rate-sensitive stocks (Theme, created Feb 3, 2015):
rate sensitive 2015 theme

You can browse through all these recommendations and lists under the “Broker Recommendations” section of our Themes page. We call it Doodh Ka Doodh Pani ka Pani.

Optimization vs. Maximization

The above examples highlight the problems of trying to maximize returns. There will always be an asset class, mutual fund or stock that is doing better than what you own. And there is an entire industry of tip-sheets, newsletter writers and subscription services that promise to pick the next winner.

However, we see investing as an optimization problem. We believe that drawdowns are an inseparable part of investing. Instead, we focus on getting the right mix of assets and strategies based on your risk appetite. And we make it supremely easy to stick to a plan.

For direct equity investors, this means getting Value and Momentum right. We have created Themes based on different approaches to value and momentum investing. Investors can then map our Themes to gain exposure to a specific set of strategies.

For mutual fund investors, this means getting portfolio risk right. We have created Themes based on the risk of the overall portfolio. Investors can now tune out the noise and focus on achieving their life goals.

Investing is not easy, but your journey as an investor will be so much more smoother with us. Get in touch with us now!

Implied Volatility around Earnings Announcements

Introduction

There is a common belief that option implied volatility, which is high before earnings announcements, quickly dissipates after the event. So sell options before the event to profit from the fall in IV. We decided to put this theory to test by observing at-the-money IVs 5-days before earnings announcements and their subsequent behavior.

It is not what you expect.

ATM IVs

Here are the at-the-money implied vols 5-days before and the day after announcements:

atm iv announcement

In our study, IV falls only 44% of the time. So the blanket statement fails. IV dissipation is not guaranteed. There are a lot of other things that affect IV and earnings alone is not sufficient to predict the outcome.

However, if the IV was more the 50, then IV dissipates 70% of the time. However, these odds could be similar to those without earnings announcements as well (all things equal.) So further research is required.

Conclusion

Don’t go around selling options thinking that IV will dissipate after earnings announcements. Know your odds.

Stop-loss and Re-entry

Introduction

A trailing stop is a percentage below the most recent high at which you exit a trade. It allows you to lock-in gains while avoiding catastrophic loss. There are lot of opinions about where these should be set. And more importantly, when to re-enter. What follows is a discussion on how different stops and re-entry rules affect trading frequency and returns.

We will consider time-series from 2010 through now on the NIFTY, BANK NIFTY and CNX MIDCAP indices. During this time, the cumulative buy-and-hold returns were 61.47%, 104.81% and 75.61% respectively.

A simple 5-3 Rule

“A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.”
– George S. Patton

To get us started, we propose a trailing-stop loss at 5% and a re-entry rule that triggers when the index covers 3% from the lowest level since exiting the trade. This rule significantly increases returns and reduces draw-downs across all indices.

nifty.stop-loss.2010.5.3

bank-nifty.stop-loss.2010.5.3

mid-cap.stop-loss.2010.5.3

Index #trades cum. returns
Nifty 139 366%
Bank Nifty 209 2291%
Midcap 159 382%
The boost in returns come at additional trading costs. And even though the average number of trades work out to less than one a week, there maybe periods where it might trigger every day.

The 5-3 Trading frequency

Let’s plot the days on which this rule triggers (both buys and sells.)

nifty.stop-loss.trades

bank-nifty.stop-loss.trades

mid-cap.stop-loss.trades

By the looks of it, the stop-loss and re-entry bands are too narrow.

The 10-5 Rule

Suppose we set the trailing-stop loss at 10% and re-enter when the index covers 5%, we end up with a strategy with lower number of trades and yet, better returns and buy-and-hold.

Index #trades cum. returns
Nifty 50 100%
Bank Nifty 103 536%
Midcap 66 162%
Lower trading but lower returns as well.

Returns:
nifty.stop-loss.2010.10.5

bank-nifty.stop-loss.2010.10.5

mid-cap.stop-loss.2010.10.5

Trading Events:

nifty.stop-loss.trades.10-5

bank-nifty.stop-loss.trades.10-5

cnx-midcap.stop-loss.trades.10-5

Trailing stop-loss and re-entry scenarios

The master list of different strategies, their trading frequencies and cumulative returns.

trailing stop-loss and re-entry scenarios

Conclusion

Having a trailing stop-loss and re-entry strategy enhances returns but at the price of increased trading frequency. No combination of strategies can escape the doldrums – where the index is basically flat and you are getting whipsawed.

With a 15% tax on short-term gains, over the 5-year period, you should handicap strategy returns by 75% to do an apples-to-apples comparison on the tax-free buy-and-hold returns. If you use the 10-5 rule, it means you will only come-out ahead trading the Bank Nifty. So you are better off with the 5-3 rule given where trading costs stand.

Investing in European Equities

Why Now?

Here are the top 5 reasons why investors should look at European equities:

  1. The ECB’s $1.1 trillion bond-buying program is beginning to kick in.
  2. The slide in the euro’s value against the dollar has also made European exports more competitive.
  3. Valuations appear attractive.
  4. Eurozone corporates are less leveraged, and their profitability has remained resilient.
  5. Greece is a source of uncertainty. Investing during uncertain times bears outsized returns.

How?

Unless you have a foreign equities trading account, the only way you can invest in European equities are through feeder funds or international funds. Feeder funds are just a wrapper around another fund. One such fund is the Religare Invesco Pan European Equity Fund. It feeds into the Invesco Pan European Equity Fund (MorningStar.)

It can be argued that investing in a narrow geographic is riskier compared to investing in a broad international fund. We had highlighted one such fund, the Birla Sun Life International Equity Fund Plan A, in our post about investing in non-rupee assets. If you compare the two, between 2014-03-03 and 2015-06-25, Religare’s fund gave an IRR of 1.27% vs. Birla’s 7.14%download Although this blows when compared to the CNX Midcap (IRR of 48.41% in the same period), remember that investing is all about prospective returns.

Risks

There is always the risk that Greece will blowup and drag Italy down with it, causing the Eurozone to implode. Tack on the risk of active management and currency risk (the rupee might appreciate against the euro), it becomes a pretty scary proposition. But remember, investing during uncertain times bears outsized returns.

Call us to discuss whether this fund is right for you.

Momentum should be part of every portfolio

The Two Anomalies in Finance

Momentum and Value remain the two “anomalies” in finance. The Efficient Market Hypothesis cannot explain why value investing, where investors pick up “under-priced” stocks, and momentum investing, where investors bet on stocks that have already run up, give out-sized returns compared to the rest of the market. After all, aren’t markets supposed to discover the “right” price and negate these effects?

Investing in Momentum

Value investors get a lot of face-time in media – people like to hear about stocks that are “hidden gems” that can suddenly come alive and give out-sized returns. However, very little is spoken about momentum investing. This results in investment portfolios that are underweight momentum.

The problem with momentum investing are the large draw-downs. When momentum stocks tank, they do so spectacularly. The draw-down keeps away most mutual funds from seriously pursuing this strategy: a) they can’t get out easily, and b) if they show too much volatility, investors will revolt.

But individual investors don’t have these constraints if they learn to embrace volatility.

Comparing Momentum Returns

Our FundCompare tool allows you to see how momentum investing has fared over different time-frames and compare their returns to whatever mutual fund you own. For example, if you compare Momentum with the ICICI Value Discovery Fund, here’s how the monthly returns compare:

Between 2014-01-01 and 2015-06-18, Momentum has had an IRR of 70.16% vs. ICICI Prudential Value Discovery Fund’s IRR of 50.05%download

How much should you invest?

Risk, at the end of the day, is whatever allows you to sleep at night. You could start with a 10% allocation and scale till you reach your limit. Whichever way you choose to go bout it, our Momentum Theme will be ready for you.