Category: Your Money

To SIP an ETF or Not?

The two holy grails of investing: dollar cost averaging and low-cost investing come together if you systematically invest in an index ETF. We took a look at returns on doing an SIP on JUNIORBEES, an ETF that tracks the Junior Nifty index, that was introduced in 2003.

Summary of Returns

Start Year (Jan) IRR
2004 10.77%
2005 9.48%
2006 8.66%
2007 8.47%
2008 9.81%
2009 8.70%
2010 4.91%
2011 7.40%
2012 8.58%
2013 5.33%

The experiment

The question we set out to answer was: What would typical returns be if you systematically invested in a low-cost index ETF over different periods of time?

So we assume that the investor buys Rs. 5,000 worth of JUNIORBEES at the closing price on the last day of each month. We accumulate the units, the cost basis and the P&L over different periods of time, starting at 2004 and moving forward in one-year increments.

2004 Junior Bees SIP

The dollar cost averaging ensures that you buy more ETF units when the index goes down and less of it when it trades higher. And by tracking the IRR we ensure that we normalize returns for the investment period.

2008 Junior Bees SIP

Conclusion

We expected nominal returns to be higher than what we observed. Between 2004 and 2014, inflation was often running in double digits. So even a 10% IRR would actually be negative real returns. Investors probably would have made better returns if they had kept the money in a bank fixed deposit instead. So from a purely returns perspective, an SIP on an index ETF doesn’t make sense.

Caveat: Just because the real returns were negative with this approach in the past, doesn’t mean that it will be so in the future.

Monthly Recap: The levee breaks

nifty monthly heatmap

The Nifty ended the month -3.40% (-4.30% in USD terms.)

Index Performance

IT was the only place to be long… everything else was just wrong.

monthly index performance

Top Winners and losers

DIVISLAB +7.71%
UBL +7.83%
HCLTECH +15.81%
RANBAXY -28.65%
JPASSOCIAT -26.08%
CANBK -21.65%
Well done HCL Tech, well done. Ranbaxy got tagged by the US FDA and JP Associates is the leading contender for one of the biggest break-downs this year.

ETFs

GOLDBEES +1.77%
NIFTYBEES -3.18%
INFRABEES -4.53%
JUNIORBEES -6.81%
BANKBEES -9.68%
PSUBNKBEES -13.23%
Brutal.

Advancers and Decliners

advance decline chart

Yield Curve

india yield curve

Investment Theme Performance

Sector Performance

monthly sector performance

Thought to sum up the month

Well, we had too much to drink (infrastructure debt binge, etc.) before the GFC and spent the rest of the next 5 years barely recovering (NPAs, capital raises, etc.) from the hangover. But it looks like we are going to get trampled by the herd again.

 

Source: The levee breaks

Weekly Recap: The end of work?

Nifty weekly performance heatmap

The Nifty ended the week -2.83% (-3.29% in USD terms)

Index Performance

The biggest losers were the real estate and bank indices.

weekly index performance

Top Winners and Losers

BPCL +5.70%
GODREJCP +6.90%
GLENMARK +9.57%
BANKINDIA -15.77%
JPASSOCIAT -13.81%
YESBANK -11.61%
Godrej Consumer Products finally reversed its cliff dive and retraced some of its recent losses.

ETFs

GOLDBEES -0.03%
INFRABEES -0.68%
NIFTYBEES -2.74%
JUNIORBEES -3.81%
BANKBEES -6.52%
PSUBNKBEES -7.99%
No place to hide: gold, infra, mid-caps, banks all melted under the taper heat.

Advancers and Decliners

advance decline chart

Yield Curve

Look at the move at the long-end of the curve.

india yield curve

Investment Theme Performance

Our momentum theme barely broke even but the sell-off was pretty broad based.

Sector Performance

A sea of read:

weekly sector performance

Thought for the Weekend

Karl Marx saw England’s impoverished factory workers as evidence that machines were replacing workers, throwing them into unemployment and poverty. For example, the automated power loom took over tasks formerly done by handloom weavers. Over the 19th century, weaver’s tasks were progressively automated.

 

Weaving a yard of cloth at the end of the century took only 2 percent of the human labor it took to do so on a handloom at the start of the century; machines did the rest.

 

Marx observed this automation and predicted that it would result in mass unemployment. But that’s not what happened. In fact, by the end of the century, there were four times as many factory weavers as in 1830. What Marx missed was that the new technology also increased demand. The greater output per weaver reduced the price of cloth. Consumers reacted by buying more cloth. Greater demand for cloth meant more jobs for weavers despite the automation.

 

Source: Will robots steal our jobs?

3 articles about trading and investing that you should read today

Came across a few posts that got me going “hmmm…”

How To Protect Your Portfolio

You must protect your confidence because BIG money is made after corrections, the deeper the better. You will only get yourself into a deep hole by trying to make sense of news, interest rate hikes, taper, etc…

Source: zortrades.com

The “There is no way” Market

It is precisely when you start believing that there are things the market just won’t do, that it in fact does them. You have to put your biases away and keep your mind open to what can happen. You also need to alter your strategy.

Source: bclund.com

You’ll Never Grow Rich Taking A Profit

Many of the world’s greatest investors actually have more losing trades than winning ones. But when they win, they win big. So don’t forget about the stocks you’ve sold. Create a portfolio of sold stocks and track their performance against the ones you’ve bought or continue to hold.

Source: psyfitec.com

 

The levee breaks

As of this moment, S&P 500 was -1.02%, Nasdaq -1.14%, European indices were down between 0.5 and 1%, Nikkei -2.86% and our own Nifty -1.08% to 6054

Why? Because the US Fed said nothing about emerging markets yesterday when it decided to keep tapering its QE program.

Michael Casey on MoneyBeat:

Despite pleas from emerging-market authorities during last October’s International Monetary Fund meetings in Washington – calling on the Fed to take their interests into account when it began its tapering process – they were blatantly snubbed Wednesday. Do not be surprised if the initial, post-FOMC statement slide in emerging-market currencies morphs into another, bigger rout in the days ahead. Don’t be surprised, either, to see a backlash from governments in these countries, stoking international tensions and making everyone’s jobs at managing the current turmoil all the more difficult.

 

The current rout is evoking memories of September 1992, when the Bank of England hiked its official interest rate from 10% to 12% and then to 15% in a single, chaotic day as it attempted to maintain the British pound’s peg to the deutsche mark. Traders saw the hikes as desperate measures and continued to sell the pound. Pan to the present, and we see the same story play itself out in Turkey and South Africa.

Turkey’s central bank late Tuesday hiked its one-week repo rate to 10% from 4.5%, boosted its overnight lending rate to 12% from 7.75% and lifted its overnight borrowing rate to 8% from 3.5%. After a brief respite, the lira is back under pressure and has given up most of its gains.

South African attempts to halt the sharp depreciation of the currency backfired on Wednesday with the South African rand falling as much as 3% after the country’s reserve bank decided to increase interest rates for the first time in almost six years. The Rand is at its lowest against the US Dollar since October 2008. (FT)

The Russian ruble, once a darling commodity-based currency, now stands at its lowest level in five years and is the worst-performing currency in the world this year after the Argentine peso.

So what next?

The emergency moves will likely fail. Hedge funds control more capital than emerging market central banks combined. Plus, domestic politics will not allow central banks to indefinitely follow a tight-money policy. Take Turkey for example: the economy rebounded from recession in 2009 and experienced a boom that saw the economy expand nearly 9% in 2011 and 2010. Then, however, the Turkish economy slowed to 2.2% in 2012. Its a pretty hard fall to take and high interest rates will not help the recovery. Russia’s economy expanded by only 1.3% in 2013. They too cannot afford tight-money. And India? 5% growth is a starvation level event.

Sure, not all emerging markets are cut from the same cloth but when panic hits, investors typically pull the trigger first and ask questions later. Are emerging markets a bargain? The Emerging Markets Index is roughly where it was in 2010.

Could it get cheaper? Perhaps.

And what about India? Well, we had too much to drink (infrastructure debt binge, etc.) before the GFC and spent the rest of the next 5 years barely recovering (NPAs, capital raises, etc.) from the hangover. But it looks like we are going to get trampled by the herd again.

nifty

The best part is that this storm would have passed right in time for the new government to come in and take credit for the recovery.