Category: Your Money

FCCBs–Is Disaster Lurking?

Las Vegas bail bonds financing

 

Corporate India’s worry lines do not simply end with high input costs, slackening demand, rising credit costs, and low business sentiment. Lured by buoyant share prices, companies went overboard with their fascination for Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) and raised foreign capital to fund their expansion plans from 2005-06 to 2007-08 when the bubble was just about to burst.

Riding on their heady valuations, the conversion price on such bonds was set at a steep premium, about 25-150 per cent higher than the prevailing stock price at the time of issuance and they carried zero or very low coupons.

But the crash in stock prices post the 2008-financial crisis has caught many companies that opted for the FCCB route on the wrong foot.

imageAlthough the benchmark indices have largely recovered and are about 20% below their 2008-highs, the share prices of companies with outstanding FCCBs are way below their peaks.

FCCBs worth more than US$ 7 billion is maturing by March 2013. With the first option of equity conversion knocked off, redemption pressure stares at issuers as they have to either buyback or repay the bond holders. Ratings agency CRISIL estimates that FCCBs worth Rs 220 – 240 billion may not get converted into equity shares as the current stock prices of issuing companies are significantly below their conversion price.

Take the case of Jaiprakash Associates [stockquote]JPASSOCIAT[/stockquote]. The Gaur-controlled entity issued FCCBs worth $400 million in Sept 2007, with the conversion price set at Rs 165 per share for bondholders. The stock is now quoting at Rs 64.00.

The same is the case with Tata Steel [stockquote]TATASTEEL[/stockquote], Suzlon [stockquote]SUZLON[/stockquote], RCom [stockquote]RCOM[/stockquote], Subex [stockquote]SUBEX[/stockquote], Educomp Solutions [stockquote]EDUCOMP[/stockquote], GTL Infra [stockquote]GTL[/stockquote] and others. RCom escaped the noose by tapping Chinese banks for refinancing its $1.18-bn FCCBs that were due on March 1, 2012. Suzlon, whose shares have lost about 60 percent in the last one year, is also in talks to raise $300 mn to refinance its FCCBs maturing on June 12.

image

Suzlon is currently trading at Rs 21.70 while the conversion price of its foreign currency bonds maturing this year are set at Rs 97, making them unattractive for bondholders to convert into shares.

If companies with low promoter holding opt for downward revision of the conversion price, it will only lead to further dilution of their equity stake and drag their share prices lower.

image

Moreover, the recent rupee fall has dealt a crude blow to companies. For example, a company would now need to pay an amount of about Rs 5,504 crore (based on current rupee value of Rs 55.04 per US dollar) towards the principal amount to a bondholder of $1 billion, while a similar loan amount would have been worth about Rs 4,400 crore at the start of 2010 when the rupee was quoted at Rs 44.

During these times of severe liquidity crunch, plummeting currency, highly leveraged balance sheets and tight cash flows, the upcoming redemptions can leave many companies paralyzed.

Unable to meet debt obligations or restructure terms of repayment with bondholders can lead to messy legal fights and winding up petitions as seen in the dispute between Wockhardt [stockquote]WOCKPHARMA[/stockquote] and its investors. The countdown has begun and the coming months will determine if India Inc can survive the redemption pressure or is another crisis looming?

Coal India: In the pits?

Coal India Limited (CIL) faces headwinds from different quarters. Production targets have gone awry and the impasse over fuel supply agreements with power companies continues. Amidst all this, the coal behemoth has digested a 25% wage hike in February this year even though its attempts to effect a price hike have met with stiff resistance from key customers.

Coal India [stockquote]COALINDIA[/stockquote] sells coal at a discount of up to 78% to imported Indonesian coal, giving it solid headroom to raise prices. It sells 83% of its coal at the notified price under the fuel supply agreement (FSA) and 11% of its total production through e‐auction, which is priced up to 30% higher than the notified price. Regulated sectors such as power utilities, defense, railways and fertilizers receive their quota through the FSA. 

imageIn line with international pricing mechanism, CIL migrated to a new system for pricing its non-coking (NC) coal on the basis of Gross Calorific Value (GCV) of its various grades of coal from January 01 this year. Earlier, it priced its NC coal under the Useful Heat Value (UHV) based method.

Non-coking coal is mainly sold to power companies. By raising prices, CIL hoped to offset the impact of wage hike to its over 3.65 lakh employees that would entail an outgo of over Rs 6,500 crore.

imageBut within a month, it had to roll back the price hike under the new mechanism due to stiff protests from consumers in sectors such as power and cement. The new grading system would have given CIL an additional Rs 6,250 crore annually. Bowing to pressure, the government forced Coal India to put off the price hike and said it would review the new system after three months.

NTPC [stockquote]NTPC[/stockquote], which is Coal India’s biggest customer, has vociferously opposed the switchover to GCV-based pricing saying its input costs would soar. India’s largest power generator has also refused to sign the fuel supply agreement in its present shape.

CIL wades through a critical phase wherein key policy developments relating to coal / power sectors are in the pipeline like setting up of a coal regulator, auction of coal blocks, mining bill, etc.

imageOn the operational front, Coal India’s performance has been sub-par with production languishing at around 430 million tonnes for the last three years. Its inability to raise prices to offset the rise in input costs could adversely affect its EBITDA margins.

If CIL is to increase productivity, then a price hike is long overdue. Customers have a choice- either allow the coal PSU to raise prices and benefit from increased supply or pay through the nose for imported fuel. While CIL’s profitability has got a boost from higher realizations through e-auctions, better pricing power, faster environment/ forest clearances and solution to land acquisition issues is the key to drive profitability and earnings growth going forward.

Weekly Recap

NIFTY 50.2012-05-07.2012-05-11

It was a week marred by JP Morgan’s $2 billion trading loss, Spain’s Bank bailout, anti-austerity victories in Greece and France and weak IIP numbers.

The NIFTY ended on a bearish note, melting down -1.75% for the week.

Biggest losers were JPASSOCIAT (-7.23%), PNB (-6.66%) and TATAPOWER (-6.54%).
And the biggest winners were IDFC (+7.90%), BPCL (+6.83%) and BHEL (+4.79%).
Decliners eclipsed advancers 36 vs 13
Gold: -2.83%, Infrastructure: -0.90%, Banks: -4.03%.
Daily news summaries are here.

 

Sino-India trade: Going strong but worries persist

When it comes to business, the Hindi Chini bhai-bhai comment has lived upto its billing. Despite the sharp downturn in global economy, bilateral trade between India and China has been growing, reflecting the vast potential for economic cooperation. Trade between India and China hit a record $ 73.9 billion last year, rising by almost 20%. China is the fastest growing market for India, ahead of US and Japan and two-way trade is expected to touch the $100 billion- mark by 2015.

clip_image001[8]While India’s exports to China grew by a mere $3 billion last year, China’s exports to India during the said period jumped by over $10 billion.

The huge trade imbalance in favour of our northern neighbour has been a cause of concern and India has been vocal about ‘seeking a more conducive business environment’. The trade deficit for India for 2011 stood at $ 27.08 billion.

Notwithstanding the huge trade gap, the economic relationship between the two top emerging market economies has gained much traction during the last decade.

Chinese export to India relies strongly on manufactured items meeting the demand of fast expanding sectors like telecom and power in India. Chinese companies supply equipments at competitive prices. India’s exports are characterized by primary products, raw material and intermediate products.

clip_image001[10]Items like iron Ores, textile, copper, precious stones, organic chemicals, etc. continue to dominate India’s export basket. Among these, iron ores, slag and ash comprised of a hefty 45% share while cotton, yarn and fabrics made up 14% of the export basket. The fall in export of iron ore in 2011, which has traditionally been the top export item, has been attributed to the ban on mining in Karnataka and Goa and restriction on shipments from Orissa.

Imports from China rose by 24% with India emerging as the seventh largest export destination for China with a share of 2.66% of total Chinese exports to the world. Electrical machinery accounted for a huge chunk of imports to India. The composition of export/ import basket reveals that India ships raw material to China while China sends finished, value added goods back to India.

clip_image001[12]To ensure more balanced trade ties, India wants China to import more IT, ITeS and pharma products. New Delhi has also sought removal of restrictions on import of basmati rice, fruits and vegetables, ­­ landing rights for Indian TV channels in China and import of more Indian films.

With China emerging as our largest trading partner, it is high time India ups the tempo as far as the rate of its exports is concerned in relation to imports.

clip_image002India must diversify its trade basket and press for increased access to Chinese market whose annual imports stood at $1.4 trillion annually. Trade disputes between the two are not new with both initiating anti-dumping charges against each other. India has filed more anti-dumping investigations against China than any other country at the World Trade Organization (WTO) against a host of Chinese products, from toys and mobile phones to tyres and chemicals. China has slapped anti-dumping measures on Indian antibiotics.

Despite the political distrust between the two nations, bilateral trade has grown exponentially.

While India must cash in on the growing Chinese market by targeting different segments like jewellery, pharma and services, it also needs to plug the widening trade deficit for long-term benefits. Expanding economic engagement will also set the platform for overcoming political hostilities.