Previously, we discussed how applying a trend filter to a midcap momentum index could make sense. Then, we extended that to our homegrown momentum models. In both cases, there are certain situations where trended momentum side-steps deep drawdowns. However, if you are only looking at “raw” returns, you would be better off with monthly rebalanced momentum versions.
In this post, we run a similar test on the Momo versions of our homegrown momentum models.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df30a/df30a353aeb4fe1339c394026ad7373cbe1f407f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db78c/db78c5335e1a2094ed65c549bdc62bef37579232" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ff1b/3ff1bb4c3c400bc8ab6ae4fa1f1852c6b69f4363" alt=""
The problem with high turnover strategies, beyond transaction costs, is the higher operational risk it entails. You could probably get away with postponing trades by a day or two in the monthly rebalance strategies but with these, you need automated trading systems.
You can track these strategies here: Tactical Momo (Momentum), Tactical Momo (Velocity) and Tactical Momo (Acceleration).
Code and charts: github