{"id":2124543,"date":"2020-03-17T11:54:28","date_gmt":"2020-03-17T06:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/?p=2124543"},"modified":"2020-03-22T18:05:59","modified_gmt":"2020-03-22T12:35:59","slug":"risk-management-is-not-free","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/2020\/03\/17\/risk-management-is-not-free\/","title":{"rendered":"Risk Management is Not Free"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Now that we are in the middle of a massive virus induced selloff, investors are once again interested in risk management. Similar to how flood insurance is mostly bought <em>after<\/em> a flood, investors end up paying a hefty premium for fighting the last war. Our experience with offering strategies that try to manage downside risk has been that investors flock to it <em>after<\/em> a drawdown, only to get disappointed by its returns once the market recovers and getting rid of it right before the next one. Rinse, Repeat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Risk management is not free<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>No matter how you hedge your risk (buying options, sell futures, trend-following,) it costs money. There is no system where risk management makes the investor money. So, by definition, hedged investment returns will trail buy-and-hold for long periods of time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Drawdowns and Returns are sides of the same coin<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Equity risk premium exists because of tail-risk that cannot be modeled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.rolling-returns.distribution.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Nothing &#8220;normal&#8221; about it!<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>No matter what your time-horizon, there are always periods when you will be deeply in a hole.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Hedging instruments are not perpetual<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Equities are perpetual but hedging instruments like futures and options have definite terms. They have their own peculiarities based on risk that is already being priced in vs. true tails.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Simple Moving Averages can help<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Being long an index only when it above an SMA is one way to overcome the problems highlighted above. It doesn&#8217;t involve hedging instruments, so you don&#8217;t have to worry about derivative pricing, expiry, etc. The odds are in your favor in terms of the trend being your friend. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.200-day.Rolling.Returns.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>On average, it pays to be long only when the NIFTY is above its 50-day SMA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the large daily moves occur when the index is below the SMA. Higher volatility is not necessarily bad if the drift is higher. But most investors rather sit out the volatility than dive in get their guts punched.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.daily-return.Density.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Next-day returns under different SMA &#8220;regimes&#8221;<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>What would returns look like if you were long only when the index traded above its SMA? It really depends on your time horizon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.long-only.backtest.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Including the 2008 GFC<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Excluding 2008 and subsequent recovery<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.long-only.backtest.annual-returns.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Annual returns<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.Trades.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Get ready to be whip-lashed<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.50.SMA.metrics.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>Trade-off between lower volatility and higher costs\/gross returns.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Problems<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>When it comes to avoiding drawdowns, you win some, you lose some.<\/li><li>Transaction costs matter. The above was modeled using an STT of 0.001% and slippage of 0.05% on the sell side. And capital gains taxes have been ignored.<\/li><li>Trading this using ETFs would be <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"sub-optimal (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/2018\/10\/24\/etf-premium-discount-to-nav\/\" target=\"_blank\">sub-optimal<\/a>. So it is not clear how this strategy can be expressed.<\/li><li>Outcomes would depend on holding periods. Investors can go a long time under-performing the index and experiencing every bump that comes along.<\/li><li>Shorter the SMA period (50-day shown above is not written in stone,) more the transaction costs and slippage.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Different look-back periods<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>What if you shortened the SMA period to 20 days?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.20.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>20-days<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>And what if you increased it to 200 days?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%2050%20TR.200.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>200-days<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What about Midcaps?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%20MIDCAP%20150%20TR.20.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>20-days<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%20MIDCAP%20150%20TR.50.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>50-days<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%20MIDCAP%20150%20TR.50.SMA.metrics.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%20MIDCAP%20150%20TR.100.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>100-days<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/stockviz\/blog\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\/NIFTY%20MIDCAP%20150%20TR.200.SMA.long-only.backtest.2010.png\" alt=\"\" \/><figcaption>200-days<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who should hedge?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of the time, markets recover. However, the recovery time varies each time and there is no way to time hedging strategies. And each under-lying index behaves differently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So, the reason to do it is investor&#8217;s own psychology and the asset one is long. If you, as a buy-and-hold long-term investor, can stomach the volatility, then there is probably no reason to hedge. Besides, portfolio volatility can be reduced through asset allocation as well (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"here (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/2019\/01\/29\/stock-and-bond-correlations-and-volatility\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>, <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"here (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/2019\/04\/26\/volatility-and-returns\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And remember: risk-management, whatever the strategy, involves paying upfront to mitigate risk that may or may-not befall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Code and more charts on <a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/stockviz\/blog\/tree\/master\/technical\/sma-plots\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"github (opens in a new tab)\">github<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Now that we are in the middle of a massive virus induced selloff, investors are once again interested in risk management. Similar to how flood insurance is mostly bought after a flood, investors end up paying a hefty premium for fighting the last war. Our experience with offering strategies that try to manage downside risk &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2091073,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3471],"tags":[3541,4033],"class_list":["post-2124543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-investing-insight","tag-backtest","tag-risk","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2124543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2124543"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2124543\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2091073"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2124543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2124543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2124543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}