{"id":2005931,"date":"2014-10-06T20:04:03","date_gmt":"2014-10-06T14:34:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/?p=2005931"},"modified":"2014-10-06T20:04:03","modified_gmt":"2014-10-06T14:34:03","slug":"risk-volatility-returns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/2014\/10\/06\/risk-volatility-returns\/","title":{"rendered":"Risk, Volatility and Returns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Many investors believe that more risk implies more returns. However, that is an over-simplification: more risk implies a <em>higher probability<\/em> of more returns (and a higher probability of loss, as well.) Higher risk also implies higher volatility. This graphic is probably the best illustration of the relationship between risk, volatility and returns.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/09\/risk-return.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/09\/risk-return.png\" alt=\"risk-return\" width=\"485\" height=\"304\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2002991\" srcset=\"https:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/09\/risk-return.png 485w, https:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/09\/risk-return-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/09\/risk-return-478x300.png 478w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 485px) 100vw, 485px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As mutual fund investors, you may have come across the ICICI Prudential &#8220;Very Aggressive&#8221; and the &#8220;Very Cautious&#8221; funds. Lets compare their relative performance across different time horizons to further understand the relationship between risk, volatility and returns.<\/p>\n<h3>Since March 2008<\/h3>\n<p>Since 2008-03-03, ICICI Prudential Very Aggressive fund has returned a cumulative <strong>56.24%<\/strong> vs. ICICI Prudential Very Cautious fund&#8217;s cumulative return of <strong>53.30%<\/strong>. The 3% out-performance came with significant stomach-ulcer causing volatility.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/10\/icici-2008.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/10\/icici-2008.png\" alt=\"icici 2008\" width=\"623\" height=\"467\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2005941\" srcset=\"https:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/10\/icici-2008.png 623w, https:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/10\/icici-2008-300x224.png 300w, https:\/\/portalvhds29z8xdrqhczq.blob.core.windows.net\/wordpress\/2014\/10\/icici-2008-400x300.png 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 623px) 100vw, 623px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It would require someone to have some serious testicular fortitude to hang-on to their investments after a 45% drawdown. It took the &#8220;Very Aggressive&#8221; fund more than a year to claw itself out of the hole. And many investors would have abandoned the fund during that period.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s wealth chart:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/adhoc\/a6656efcd897466fb22497976ae63c9b635482170775181782.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/adhoc\/a6656efcd897466fb22497976ae63c9b635482170775181782.png\" width=\"1000\" height=\"800\" class=\"alignnone\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>Since March 2009<\/h3>\n<p>Boom!<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/adhoc\/df9194f406db4a2f9ab6003f26157b69635482198842428656.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/adhoc\/df9194f406db4a2f9ab6003f26157b69635482198842428656.png\" width=\"1000\" height=\"800\" class=\"alignnone\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Since 2009-03-02, &#8220;Very Aggressive&#8221; returned a cumulative <strong>169.40%<\/strong> vs. the &#8220;Very Cautious&#8221; cumulative return of <strong>41.37%<\/strong>. Max Drawdown: <strong>-13.81%<\/strong> vs. <strong>-4.70%<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>Peace of mind came with a very high performance penalty.<\/p>\n<h3>Since March 2010<\/h3>\n<p>Since 2010-03-02, &#8220;Very Aggressive&#8221;: <strong>50.02%<\/strong>, &#8220;Very Cautious&#8221;: <strong>35.48%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/adhoc\/92fdad209a11471bb5ec52f626ac55e7635482200334782744.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/adhoc\/92fdad209a11471bb5ec52f626ac55e7635482200334782744.png\" width=\"1000\" height=\"800\" class=\"alignnone\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3>And This Year<\/h3>\n<p>Since 2010-03-02, &#8220;Very Aggressive&#8221;: <strong>17.58%<\/strong>, &#8220;Very Cautious&#8221;: <strong>7.54%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3>Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>The real risk, if you are investing for retirement, is the inability to maintain a certain lifestyle post-retirement due to inadequate savings. Ideally, your investments should be risk-seeking when you are young and risk-avoiding as you near retirement. You can use a set of funds to reflect this attitude towards risk. And there is almost never a &#8220;one-size-fits-all-5-star-gold-plated&#8221; fund that you can remain invested forever.<\/p>\n<p>You can run our very own comparison tool: <a href=\"http:\/\/stockviz.biz\/FundCompare\" target=\"_blank\">FundCompare<\/a> to see how different funds performed over different time frames, indices and other funds.<br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\n&nbsp;<br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"row-fluid well well-small\">\nPlease get in touch with Shyam for advice on investing in mutual funds.<br \/>\nYou can either WhatsApp him or call him at 080-2665-0232.<br \/>\nHe is an AMFI registered IFA who can advice you on Mirae, HDFC, ICICI Pru, UTI and Birla Sun Life funds.\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many investors believe that more risk implies more returns. However, that is an over-simplification: more risk implies a higher probability of more returns (and a higher probability of loss, as well.) Higher risk also implies higher volatility. This graphic is probably the best illustration of the relationship between risk, volatility and returns. As mutual fund &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3471,9],"tags":[17],"class_list":["post-2005931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-investing-insight","category-your-money","tag-mutual-funds","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2005931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2005931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2005931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2005931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2005931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stockviz.biz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2005931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}