Suppose you are moderately bullish about a stock/index and you feel that it has room to run but its not going to be gangbusters. Then you could buy a call outright but that could be expensive. What you could do is buy the call and then sell a call at a higher strike to mitigate the cost of your (moderately) bullish outlook.
A long call spread (or a bull spread) contains two calls with the same expiration but different strikes. The strike of the short call is higher than the strike of the long call. The short call’s main purpose is to help pay for the long call’s upfront cost.
The Max loss is the net premium paid: Rs.1825.00
For the trade to break even, the NIFTY should end above 6786.50 at expiration (April 24).
The Max profit at expiration is Rs.3175.00
The long call is more sensitive to changes in the underlying than the short call due to its ATM-ness.
All the greeks, δ, θ, κ, and λ are higher for the long call than for the short call.
The long-call will lose money faster to time decay than the short call.
By freezing all other inputs, you can observe θs across different strikes of the bull spread at different values of the NIFTY as expiry approaches:
Time decay is helpful to this position when it is profitable and harmful when it is loss-making.
Similarly, observe how δs of the bull spread at different values of the NIFTY as expiry approaches:
Exiting the trade
If the trade is profitable, allow time-decay to work for you. You could even hold this to expiration. If the position is moving against you, it is best to cut your losses.
We had pointed out back in February as to how startups are disintermediating banking and that given the amount of data that both banks and Facebook have on us, it is only a matter of time that we saw a “Facebook National Bank.” Turns out that it is now a reality:
Facebook is readying itself to provide financial services in the form of remittances and electronic money. The social network is only weeks away from obtaining regulatory approval in Ireland for a service that would allow its users to store money on Facebook and use it to pay and exchange money with others. “Facebook wants to become a utility in the developing world, and remittances are a gateway drug to financial inclusion.”
Source: Facebook targets financial services
Your world at 9am
|Brent Crude Oil
|WTI Crude Oil
Infosys: Neither the company’s March quarter results, nor its guidance give signs that the company is out of the woods. (LiveMint) INFY 3,162.05 -97.75 (-3.00%)
The Grossman-Stiglitz paradox says that if asset prices perfectly reflected all information, then there would be no reason for anyone to collect information and trade assets, so asset prices couldn’t perfectly reflect all information.
Indexing is basically the contrapositive of the Grossman-Stiglitz paradox. If everyone tries to beat the market, then it will be hard to beat the market: You’ll be competing with everyone else to get information that you can use to outperform the market. If it’s hard to beat the market, it makes good sense to index. If everyone starts indexing, then it’s easy to beat the market: Nobody else is gathering information, so any information that you gather will make you money. (Bloomberg)
Modi has created huge hope and aspirations and any failure to deliver on these heightened expectations will be catastrophic for his personal ambitions.(Rediff) But be prepared to be disappointed. (What can Modi do?)
The first rule of trading options is that options are not stocks. Just because the underlying stock moves doesn’t mean that the option moves in the same direction. You need to think of options as a separate asset class.
For example, if you are in a ship at sea, you know that the tides are linked to the phases of the moon. But the tides are only a small part of what is involved in sailing, isn’t it? You should also know about ocean currents, developing weather patterns, presence of icebergs, reefs, etc… Similarly, the option premium is only lightly tethered to the value of the underlying.
The key thing to remember is that the option premium is a function of intrinsic value, time value and volatility.
Lets say you buy a April NIFTY 6750 Call @ Rs. 59.70 when the NIFTY was trading at 6733.10. Say, the NIFTY rallies by 1% to 6800.431 the next minute. Would your call option also increase by 1%? Nope. It will probably tick up by 0.5% Why? because the delta(δ) of that option is 0.49
But what if the NIFTY rallies tomorrow by 2%. Will your call option premium now increase by 1%? Nope. There are two opposing forces that are now acting on the option.
The first, and the strongest force, is time decay. It is known to crush the best laid plans of both men and mice.
The second, is volatility. As a buyer of an option, you want volatility to go up, and NIFTY rallying by 2% in a day is just that.
It is not only important to mind your greeks at the time of putting on the trade, but you need to monitor it constantly. Greeks change not only as the underlying moves, but also as expiration approaches.
Remember your Greeks:
|Measures the impact of change in volatility (σ)
||Measures the impact of change in time remaining
||Measures the impact of change in underlying price
||Measures the rate of change of delta(δ)
The ability of forecasters to predict turning points is limited. Forecasts from the official sector, either from national sources or international agencies, are no better at predicting turning points.
So the explanation for why recessions are not forecasted ahead of time lies in three other classes of theories, which are not mutually exclusive.
- One class says that forecasters do not have enough information to reliably call a recession. Economic models are not reliable enough to predict recessions, or recessions occur because of shocks (e.g. political crises) that are difficult to anticipate.
- A second class of theories says that forecasters do not have the incentive to predict a recession, which – though not a tail – event are still relatively rare. Included in this class are explanations that rely on asymmetric loss functions: there may be greater loss – reputational and other kinds – for incorrectly calling a recession than benefits from correctly calling one.
- The third class stresses behavioural reasons for why forecasters hold on to their priors and only revise them slowly and insufficiently in response to incoming information.
A more than a healthy dose of skepticism is always warranted when dealing with these so called “expert forecasts.”
Source: “There will be growth in the spring”: How well do economists predict turning points?